Search:

Home | Reiki


Should Reiki Really Be Considered A Massage Therapy?

By: Terry McDermott

I don’t know about you but when I go for a massage I expect the
massage therapist to use their hands, fingers and maybe even
their elbows to loosen my stress-laden muscles. There is
nothing more delightful than an experienced pair of hands that
helps to expunge all of the bad stuff from my body that causes
me to become tense, anxious and, perhaps, a bit unpleasant to
be around sometimes.

I still vividly remember a visit with a physical therapist for
a problem that I was having with a disk in my neck. The disk
was pinching a nerve which was causing pain in my neck, back
and arm. A particularly annoying area was near my shoulder
above my shoulder blade. As I sat in a massage chair, the
therapist used her elbow to dig right into the affected area
with a force that caused some serious discomfort. But when I
left that morning, the pain was almost gone. Now that was
massage!

Recently, I was introduced to the concept of Reiki. I was
reading up on the various forms of massage therapy and, quite
frequently, Reiki was listed as a therapeutic option or as part
of the curriculum at a massage school. Further reading about
Reiki has caused me to question references to Reiki in the same
context as massage. In fact, I began to wonder why Reiki was
included in references to massage at all. And I’m not the only
one.

Massage is generally defined as “the manipulation of the soft
tissues of the body for therapeutic purposes, healing or
relaxation.” I would think that “manipulation” is the operative
word here. The practice of Reiki takes a quite different
approach. Like Shiatsu massage, Reiki seeks to balance “ki” or
“life force energy” within the body. The theory, according to
ancient Oriental philosophy, is that if this energy is out of
balance in the body, or is depleted, then an individual becomes
susceptible to physical and emotional ailments. Practitioners of
Reiki seek to channel energy into their clients in a manner that
corrects imbalances and promotes healing.

However, based on the prescribed methods of practicing Reiki,
there is no “manipulation” involved. In fact, in some cases,
there is not even actual touch involved in Reiki treatments.
That would certainly present a conflict between the generally
accepted definition of massage and the practice of Reiki.

Reiki, as practiced today, was developed by Dr. Mikao Usui, a
minister and head of a Christian school in Japan. His students
had asked him how Jesus healed. Usui did not have the answer
but became fixated on discovering how Jesus had cured the ill
and infirmed. ( I guess “because he was the Son of God” does
not qualify as an acceptable answer.)

Dr. Usui spent years studying in Christian schools, Buddhist
monasteries and temples. He found no answer to the healing
question until he embarked on a 21 day fast. At the end of the
fast he apparently had a revelatory experience that showed him
the methods he had sought to understand. He then set about on a
healing ministry. Eventually, he shared his knowledge with Dr.
Chujiro Hyashi who, in turn shared the knowledge with Mrs.
Hawayo Takata who trained 22 Reiki Masters who then shared the
knowledge with thousands of others.

Essentially, Reiki transfers energy from the Reiki practitioner
to the patient. Actually, Reiki teaches that the patient draws
this energy from the practitioner thus giving the patient an
active role and ultimate responsibility for their own healing.
The energy is then realigned and balanced and harmony is
restored in the body.

Though it is not a religion there is a great deal of
spirituality at work in Reiki. God or a Universal Life Force is
acknowledged and recognized as the source of all life energy.
Though there are specific principles involved in Reiki, the
actual methods are quite similar to the “laying on of hands”
practiced by faith healers of many religious denominations. But
“laying on of hands” is not quite the same as “the manipulation
of soft tissue” required to be defined as massage.

There are a couple of issues here. First, massage as a stand
alone practice, has struggled to be recognized by the medical
establishment as a legitimate form of therapy and healing.
Under the auspices of physical therapy, massage is readily
accepted and practiced to restore muscular function and to
assist in the rehabilitative process. However, there is the
view by many that massage therapy is somewhat of a “mongrel”
healing application with touches of mainstream medicine,
alternative medicine, holistic, health, New Age cultism, sexual
indulgence and mystical fakery. The simple fact is the “the
manipulation of soft tissue” has been proven and is accepted as
a healing modality. It is the desire to include any healing
avocation that involves touch, or even the close proximity of
hand to body, under the heading of massage that creates
confusion and causes suspicion.

Scientists and doctors have dismissed Reiki as a placebo that
encourages patients to feel better because they are supposed to
feel better. Other questions about the motivation of
practitioners is the fact that Dr. Usui, the founder of Reiki,
determined that there must be an “energy exchange” between
Reiki healer and Reiki patient to invest the patient in the
healing process. This investment is monetary in most cases and
is a core principle of Reiki.

Another problem with Reiki being considered a form of massage
is that some states require that practitioners of Reiki be
licensed as massage therapists. Many Reiki practitioners
dispute this categorization specifically because of the
distinction between Reiki and massage as stated in the
definitions presented earlier in this article.

So, Reiki has a bit of a schizophrenic personality. On the one
hand, courses teaching Reiki are offered in many massage
schools. On the other hand, many practitioners themselves don’t
consider themselves massage therapists. So, far be it from me to
try and settle this dispute in one article. Reiki may or may not
be a truly effective form of healing. All I know is that I still
have difficulty categorizing Reiki as massage. I think there may
be some “manipulation” of the definition of massage required to
justify the inclusion of Reiki.

About the Author: J. Terrence McDermott is the administrator of Massage Schools Guide at www.massageschoolsguide.com, a website offering a variety of resources for prospective massage therapists. He has developed a national directory of massage schools with program highlights and contact information. He specializes in online continuing education resources and also administers Access Online Degrees at www.accessonlinedegrees.com.

Article Source: www.NewAgeArticles.com

Important: To use this article on your web site, click the "Website Ready" button in the upper right column of this page.

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Reiki Articles Via RSS!
















Copyright © 2008 www.NewAgeArticles.com - All Rights Reserved









































Powered by Article Dashboard